Sunday, 24 February 2013

How can Phimosis be Treated?



How can Phimosis be Treated?



 



 



Circumcision is the only permanent cure. This refers to the surgical removal of foreskin.

The normal non-retractile foreskin during childhood must be recognized and left alone. In such cases, patients and their parents should be advised against attempting forcible or premature retraction of the foreskin, and avoiding excessive washing of the penis with soap.

Once phimosis is diagnosed, the available treatments include-

Topical corticosteroids- Phimosis can be treated by the local application of topical steroids (betamethasone cream 0.05%) in 80-90% of cases. 

Manual stretching


Preputial plasty


Circumcision- Circumcision is the surgical procedure for removal of the foreskin.

Conservative treatments should be tried first and surgery should be used as a last resort.
 

Modern treatment of phimosis



Modern treatment of phimosis

Non-surgical methods now the standard approach

Much of the pressure for circumcision in the Victorian era and up until the 1960s was fear of phimosis - inability or difficulty in retracting the foreskin to expose the glans. In the nineteenth century this condition was wrongly believed to be the cause of a host of nervous and other diseases, leading many doctors to insist that unless the foreskin was fully mobile within a few weeks of birth, circumcision was essential. It was not until the 1940s that this error was corrected by Douglas Gairdner, though it persists in parts of the United States to this day. Research since the 1940s has established that it is perfectly normal for the foreskin not to become retractable until a boy reaches puberty, and that there is no need for any intervention unless he is experiencing discomfort, since most cases resolve spontaneously as he matures.
For cases of persistent phimosis, where there was discomfort, pain or other problems, it is true that there was probably no alternative to circumcision until the 1990s, when it was realised that the application of steroids caused the foreskin tissue to loosen and expand, thus permitting retraction. A host of articles in medical journals since the early 1990s has now established beyond any doubt that application of one or more of several different steroid creams to the foreskin is nearly always effective in resolving problem cases of phimosis. The notion that circumcision is the appropriate response to phimosis is now outdated and unscientific. The only situation where circumcision may still be necessary is in persistent cases of Balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO or Lichen sclerosus - a very rare skin disease, possibly of fungal origin, but not yet fully understood) that do not respond to conservative treatment.
Most of these articles are available on CIRP, but an additional selection of articles is provided below. These show how assertions of the need for circumcision have decreased as understanding of normal penile development has improved. It is interesting to observe how allegations of the "need" for circumcision fade away as it is increasingly appreciated that, in most cases, the phimotic condition is normal and harmless, and that the foreskins of many healthy boys  do not become fully retractable until puberty or even later. In the first paper below (early 1990s) doctors are still circumcising quite young boys whose foreskins have not become retractable if they do not respond quickly to the steroid treatment. But as more experience is gained (and as false Victorian/Edwardian understanding dissipates) the anxiety recedes.  It comes to be appreciated that that it is quite normal for foreskins not to become retractable until puberty or after, and that in many cases they will do so naturally, even without treatment. What is particularly interesting about the results of many of the papers below is the number of boys in the control (non-treatment) group whose phimosis resolved quite naturally during the course of the study. The lesson here is to be patient and recall the old proverb: Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.
It is doubtful whether any boy needs treatment unless he is still phimotic after puberty and experiencing discomfort, but is is certainly better to undergo a harmless  course of steroid ointment than to suffer the risks and losses of amputating surgery. There is some evidence that extra testosterone can also held achieve foreskin mobility, suggesting that a low testosterone level may be connected with the phimotic condition in the first place.

Phimosis and Paraphimosis

Phimosis and Paraphimosis

When the foreskin won't retract

 

 

  • Phimosis, or preputial stenosis, is a term that usually means any condition where the foreskin of the penis cannot be retracted.

  • Most infants are born with a foreskin that cannot be retracted and the prepuce may be tight until after puberty.

  • A fully retractable foreskin occurs in 50% of ten year olds, 90% of 16 year olds and 98 to 99% of 18 year olds.

  • Causes of Phimosis
    Phimosis can be caused by failure of foreskin to loosen during growth, infections such as balinitis, deformities caused by trauma and diseases of the genitals.
    Symptoms of Phimosis
    Phimosis is usually painless condition. Infection may result from an inability to carry out effective cleaning of the area in which case swelling, redness and discharge may all be present making the area tender and painful. A very tight foreskin can cause problems during intercourse, urination.
    Paraphimosis
    An inability to pull back the foreskin into position over the head of the penis can cause pain, swelling of the head of the penis and the foreskin. It may cause restricted blood flow, causing the head of the penis to become dark purple in color. If this should occur emergency treatment is required.
    Deciding on treatment
    Medical opinion differs on the condition and on treatment. It has been suggested that any radical or surgical treatments for phimosis should not be done until after puberty. This has partly come about because of the reaction to the over use of circumcision as a mainstream treatment for phimosis. It has also been reported by bodies such as CIRP that significant numbers of doctors are unable to recognise normal developmental tight prepuce and pathological phimosis. It is believed that many unnecessary circumcisions are performed because of current medical practice and misdiagnosis of phimosis. Balanitis xeroticia obliterans has been sited as one of the only causes of phimosis that should lead to a surgical circumcision.

     Treatment of Phimosis
    If treatment is required there are three main types:

  • Tropical creams, steroidal and non steroidal, applied to the prepuce.

  • Gradual stretching of the opening of the prepuce to widen it.

  • Surgical reshaping of the prepuce to make it wider.

  • All these treatments tend to avoid the side effects associated with surgical circumcision, trauma, pain, side effects of removal of the foreskin such as friction and interference of the erogenous and sexual functions. Treatment of Paraphimosis
    If the foreskin cannot be pulled back into place treatment should be sought. If the blood flow to the penis is restricted then emergency treatment is required and if the foreskin cannot be pulled back a surgical cut to the trapped foreskin may be required. Failure to seek treatment can result in permanent damage to the penis.

     Hygiene and the Foreskin
    -
  • The American Academy of Pediatics recommends that the immature foreskin of intact boys is not forced back for cleaning.

  • The only person who should clean and retract the foreskin is the boy himself. Bubble bath products and other chemical irritants can cause the foreskin to tighten and it is recommended they should be avoided by intact males.
  • Clinical Guidelines for Phimosis

    Clinical Guidelines for Phimosis

    Dr Peter Ball MB,B Chir
    John Dalton Bsc,Msc
    Last updated on 1st May 2008

    The Management of Phimosis

    These clinical guidelines have been drafted by NORM-UK for the guidance of medical practitioners and health authorities on the diagnosis and treatment of phimosis. These guidelines are the first in a series of guidelines which will include guidelines for the treatment of balanoposthitis and other conditions which may affect the foreskin.

    Normal Anatomy and Development

    The foreskin or prepuce is an integral, normal part of the penis that forms an anatomical covering over the glans. It is a specialised junctional mucosa with unique innervation enabling it to function as erogenous tissue [ 1 ]. Specialised sensory receptors of the prepuce include Meissner and Vater-Pacini corpuscles, Merkel cell discs, and thousands of nerve endings [ 2 ]. The sensory receptors of the ridged band of the preputial mucosa may form part of the afferent limb of the ejaculatory reflex [ 3 ]. The development of the prepuce is incomplete in the newborn male child. Separation from the glans and foreskin retractability occurs at a variable age. There is no deadline for this and often full retractability does not occur until well into the teenage years. A non-retractable foreskin in a pre-pubescent child is not a disease and requires no treatment.[ 5 ]

    Diagnosis

    Non-retractability of the foreskin in childhood does not constitute phimosis. Ballooning during micturition is a harmless and transient phenomenon and is part of normal development requiring no treatment [ 6 ]. True phimosis has been defined as scarring of the tip of the prepuce, and is usually due to Balanitis Xerotica Obliterans (BXO) [ 7 ]. The incidence of pathological phimosis in boys has been recently reported as 0.4 cases/1000 boys per year, or 0.6% of boys affected by their 15th birthday [ 8 ]. The non-retractable foreskin in adult life may also be regarded as phimosis.

    Treatment

    The normal non-retractile foreskin of childhood must be recognised and left alone. Patients and their parents should be advised not to attempt forcible or premature retraction of the foreskin, and to avoid excessive washing with soap.

    Once phimosis is diagnosed, the available treatments include topical corticosteroids, manual stretching, preputial plasty and circumcision. Conservative treatments should be tried in the first instance and surgery used as the treatment of last resort. Details of the various treatment options are given below.

    Topical Steroids

    A number of studies show that phimosis can be safely and effectively treated by the application of topical steroids in 80-90% of cases.[ 9-16 ]. Betamethasone cream 0.05% should be applied to the exterior and interior of the tip of the foreskin 2-3 times daily. The treatment should be discontinued as ineffective after 3 months if the foreskin has not become retractile during this time.

    Conservative Surgery

    A number of plastic corrections are available for the adult or adolescent non-retractable foreskin.[ 19-32. ]. These include preputial plasty, in which a dorsal, longitudinal incision is made through the constrictive band of the foreskin. The underlying tissue is spread with artery forceps to expose the Buck's fascia and the incision is closed transversely with absorbable sutures. This procedure has less morbidity than circumcision, and allows the prepuce to be retained.

    Circumcision

    As with any surgery, circumcision is very traumatic to a child. It is essentially irreversible and should be the treatment of last resort. Pathological phimosis due to BXO has been considered the one common absolute indication for circumcision.[ 33 ]. BXO however, is the same as Lichen Sclerosis Atrophicans (LSA) [ 34 ]. Circumcision has been reported to be ineffective in preventing or treating BXO.[ 35-37 ]. BXO does respond to topical corticosteroids,[ 38, ] topical testosterone,[ 39 ] or carbon dioxide laser treatment [ 40-41 ]. One report shows that long term antibiotic treatment is effective, but there is doubt as to whether this is due to antimicrobial activity.[ 42 ]

    Cautions for Circumcision

    Circumcision is essentially irreversible and should be the treatment of last resort. If a circumcision is to be performed, all the following patient criteria should be met.
    • Have a genuine therapeutic indication for circumcision, conservative treatment having been tried and failed.
    • Have understood the implications of circumcision and be willing to have the operation.
    • Have understood that circumcision has at least a 2% chance of serious complications.[ 43 ]
    • Have a supportive friend or relative to stay with them overnight.

    References (links will open in a new window)

    01. Cold C and Taylor J. The Prepuce. BJU International, 1999;83: Suppl 1, 34-44
    02. Cold C and McGrath K. Anatomy and histology of the penile and clitoral prepuce in primates. In G Denniston et al (eds), Male and female circumcision: Medical, Legal and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice (1999). NY Plenum.
    03. Taylor JR, Lockwood and Taylor AJ. The Prepuce: Specialised Mucosa of the Penis and its Loss to Circumcision. Brit J Urol 1996;77:291-295
    04. Gairdner DM, MRCP. The Fate of the Foreskin. BMJ. 1949;2:1433-1437
    05. Oster J, Further fate of the Foreskin. Arc Dis Child, 1968;43:200-36
    06. Rickwood AMK and Walker J. Is phimosis overdiagnosed and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence? An Royal Coll Surg Engl, 1989;71:275-7
    07. Rickwood AMK, Hemalatha V, Batcup G and Spitz L. Phimosis in boys. BJ Urol 1980;52:147-150
    08. Shankar KR and Rickwood AMK. The incidence of phimosis in boys. BJU International 1999;84:101-2
    09. Lang K. Eine konservative Therapie der Phimose. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd. 1986;134:824-5
    10. Meyrick Thomas RH, Ridley CM, Black MM. Clinical features and therapy of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus affecting males. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1987;12:126-128
    11. Fortier-Bealieu M, Thomine E, Mitrofanof P Laurent P, Heinet J. Lincehn sclero-atrophique preputial de l'enfant. Ann Pediatr (Paris).1990;3:673-676
    12. Jorgensen ET, Svensson A. The treatment of phimosis in boys with a potent topical steriod (clobetsol propinate 0.05%) cream. Acta Derm Verereol 1993;73:55-6
    13. Kikiros CS, Beasley SW, Woodward AA. The response of phimosis to local steriod application. Pediatr Surg Int 1993;8:329-32
    14. Wright JE. The treatment of phimosis with topical steriod. Aust NZ J Surg 1994;64:327-8
    15. Jorgensen ET, Svensson A. Phimosis hos pjkar kan behandlas med steriod salva (letter) Lakartidningen 1994;91:1291
    16. Golubovic Z, Milanovic D et al. The conservative treatment of phimosis in boys. Brit J Urol 1996;78:786-788
    17. Beauge M. Conservative Treatment of Primary Phimosis in Adolescents [Traitment Medical du Phimosis Congenital de L'Adolescent]. Saint Antione University, Paris VI, 1990-1991
    18. Dunn HP. Non-surgical management of phimosis. Aust NZ J Surg. 1989;59:963
    19. Diaz A, Kantor HI. Dorsal Slit. A circumcision alternative. Obstet Gynecol 1971;37:619-22
    20. Parkash S. Phimosis and it's plastic correction. J Indian Med Assoc 1972;58:389-90
    21. Holmland DE. Dorsal incision of the prepuce and skin closure with Dexon in patients with phimosis. Scan J Urol Nephrol 1973;7:97-9
    22. Emmett AJ. Four V-flap repair of preputial stenosis (phimosis). Plast Reconstr Surg 1975;55:687-9
    23. Gil Barbosa M, Aquilera Gonzalez C, Alipaz A, Garcia Sanchez JL. La balanolisis como sustituto de la circumcision. Salud Publica Mex 1976;18:893-9
    24. Ohijimi T, Ohijimi H. Special surgical techniques for relief of phimosis. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1981;7:326-30
    25. Emmett AJ. Z-plasty reconstruction for preputial stenosis- a surgical alternative to circumcision. Aust Paediatr J 1982;18:219-20
    26. Hoffman S. Metz P, Ebbehoj J. A new operation for phimosis: prepuce saving technique with multiple Y-V plasties. Br J Urol 1984;56:319-21
    27. Moro G, Gesmundo R, Bevilacqua A, Maiullari E, Gandini R. La circoncisione con postoplastica. Nota di tecnica operatoria. Minerva Chir 1988;43:893-4
    28. * Wahlin N. "Triple incision plasty". A convenient procedure for preputial relief. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1992;26(2):107-10.
    29. Cuckow PM, Rix G, Mouriquand PD. Preputial plasty: a good alternative to circumcision. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:561-3
    30. de Castella H. Prepuceplasty: an alternative to circumcision. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994;76:257-8
    31. Leal MJ, Mendes J. A circuncisao ritual e correccao plastica da fomise. Acta Med port 1994;7:475-481
    32. Ohijim H, Ogata K, Ohijim T. A new method for the relief of adult phimosis. J Urol 1995;153:1607-9
    33. Rickwood AMK, Medical indications for circumcision. BJU Intl. 1999;83 Suppl 1: 45-51.
    34. Pasieczny TA. The treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans with testosterone propinate ointment. Acta Derm Venereol. 1977;57(3):275-7
    35. Freeman C and Laymon CW. Archs Derm Syph 1941;44:547
    36. Laymon CW and Freeman C. Archs Derm Syph 1944;49:57
    37. Catteral RD and Oates JK. Br J Vener Dis. 1962;38:75
    38. Poynter JH, Levy J. Balanitis xerotica obliterans; effective treatment with topical and sublesional corticosteroids. Brit J Urol 1967 Aug 39(4);420-5.
    39. Pasieczny TA. The treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans with testosterone propinate ointment. Acta Derm Venereol 1977;57 (3):275-7
    40. Ratz JL. Carbon dioxide laser treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984;10 (5 Pt 2):925-8
    41. Rosemberg SK. Carbon dioxide laser treatment of external genital lesions. Urology 1985;25(6):55-8
    42. Shelley WB, Shelley ED, Grunenwald MA, Anders TJ, Ramnath A. Long term antibiotic therapy for balanitis xerotica obliterans. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999 Jan;40(1):69-72
    43. Williams N, Kapila L. Complications of circumcision. Br J Surg 1993;80:1231-36

    What is Phimosis?







                                               

    Phimosis






    Phimosis (/fɪˈmsəs/ or /fˈmsəs/[1][2]), from the Greek phimos (φῑμός ("muzzle")), is a condition where, in men, the foreskin cannot be fully retracted over the glans penis. The term may also refer to clitoral phimosis in women, whereby the clitoral hood cannot be retracted, limiting exposure of the glans clitoridis.[3]
    In the neonatal period, it is rare for the foreskin to be naturally retractable; Huntley et al. state that "non-retractability can be considered normal for males up to and including adolescence."[4] Rickwood, as well as other authors, has suggested that true phimosis is over-diagnosed due to failure to distinguish between normal developmental non-retractability and a pathological condition (a condition deemed a problem).[5] Some authors use the terms "physiologic" and "pathologic" to distinguish between these types of phimosis;[6] others use the term "non-retractile foreskin" to distinguish this developmental condition from (pathologic) phimosis.[5]
    Pathological (acquired) phimosis has several causes. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (thought to be the same condition as balanitis xerotica obliterans) is regarded as a common (or even the main[7]) cause of pathological phimosis.[8] Other causes may include scarring caused by forcible retraction of the foreskin,[6] and balanitis.[9] Beaugé found that patients with phimosis had masturbation practices that differed from the usual pulling down of the foreskin that mimics sexual intercourse.[10] Some studies found phimosis to be a risk factor for urinary retention[11] and carcinoma of the penis.[12] Common treatments include steroid creams, manual stretching, preputioplasty, and circumcision.[13]

    Contents

    • 1 Normal development
    • 2 Cause
    • 3 Management
      • 3.1 Surgery
    • 4 Prognosis
    • 5 Epidemiology
    • 6 History
    • 7 See also
    • 8 References
    • 9 External links
      • 9.1 Pictures

    Normal development

    At birth, the inner layer of the foreskin is sealed to the glans penis. This attachment forms "early in fetal development and provide[s] a protective cocoon for the delicate developing glans."[14] The foreskin is usually non-retractable in infancy and early childhood.[14]
    The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Canadian Pediatric Society state that no attempt should be made to retract the foreskin of an infant.[15][16] Age is reportedly a factor in non-retractability: according to Huntley et al. the foreskin is reportedly retractable in approximately 50% of cases at 1 year of age, 90% by 3 years of age, and 99% by age 17. These authors argue that, unless scarring or other abnormality is present, non-retractibility may "be considered normal for males up to and including adolescence."[4] Hill states that full retractability of the foreskin may not be achieved until late childhood or early adulthood.[17] A Danish survey found that the mean age of first foreskin retraction is 10.4 years.[18]
    Some pediatric urologists have argued that many physicians continue to have trouble distinguishing developmental non-retractility from pathological phimosis.[5][19][20]

    Cause

    Pathological phimosis (as opposed to the natural non-retractability of the foreskin in childhood) is rare and the causes are varied. Some cases may arise from balanitis (inflammation of the glans penis), perhaps due in turn to inappropriate efforts to retract an infant's foreskin. Other cases of non-retractile foreskin may be caused by preputial stenosis or narrowness that prevents retraction, by fusion of the foreskin with the glans penis in children, or by frenulum breve, which prevents retraction. In some cases a cause may not be clear, or it may be difficult to distinguish physiological phimosis from pathological if an infant appears to be in pain with urination or has obvious ballooning of the foreskin with urination or apparent discomfort. However, ballooning does not indicate urinary obstruction.[21]
    Phimosis in older children and adults can vary in severity, with some men able to retract their foreskin partially ('relative phimosis'), and some completely unable to retract their foreskin even in the flaccid state ('full phimosis').
    When phimosis develops in an adult who was previously able to retract his foreskin, it is nearly always due to a pathological cause, and is far more likely to cause problems for the man.
    Beaugé noted that unusual masturbation practices, such as lying face down on a bed and rubbing the penis against the mattress, may cause phimosis. Patients are advised to stop exacerbating masturbation techniques and are encouraged to masturbate by moving the foreskin up and down so as to mimic more closely the action of sexual intercourse. After giving this advice Beaugé noted not once did he have to recommend circumcision.[10][22]
    One cause of acquired, pathological phimosis is chronic balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO), a skin condition of unknown origin that causes a whitish ring of indurated tissue (a cicatrix) to form near the tip of the prepuce. This inelastic tissue prevents retraction. Infectious, inflammatory, and hormonal factors have all been implicated or proposed as contributing factors.[citation needed]
    Phimosis may occur after other types of chronic inflammation (such as balanoposthitis), repeated catheterization, or forcible foreskin retraction.[23]
    Phimosis may also arise in untreated diabetics due to the presence of glucose in their urine giving rise to infection in the foreskin.[24]

    Management

    Phimosis in infancy is nearly always physiological, and needs to be treated only if it is causing obvious problems such as urinary discomfort or obstruction. In older children and men, phimosis should be distinguished from frenulum breve, which more often requires surgery, though the two conditions can occur together.
    If phimosis in older children or adults is not causing acute and severe problems, nonsurgical measures may be effective. Choice of treatment is often determined by whether the patient (or doctor) views circumcision as an option of last resort to be avoided or as the preferred course. Some men with non-retractile foreskins have no difficulties and see no need for correction.
    Non surgical methods include:
    • Application of topical steroid cream, such as betamethasone, for 4–6 weeks to the narrow part of the foreskin is relatively simple, less expensive than surgical treatments and highly effective.[25][26] It has replaced circumcision as the preferred treatment method for some physicians in the British National Health Service.[27][28]
    • Recently, a trial of treatment with betamethasone dipropionate (0.05%) for 2 weeks is advocated in all children with phimosis before undertaking surgery. This steroid therapy demonstrated a success rate of 77%.[29]
    • Stretching of the foreskin can be accomplished manually, with balloons[30] or with other tools. Skin that is under tension expands by growing additional cells. A permanent increase in size occurs by gentle stretching over a period of time. The treatment is non-traumatic and non-destructive. Manual stretching may be carried out without the aid of a medical doctor. The tissue expansion promotes the growth of new skin cells to permanently expand the narrow preputial ring that prevents retraction. Beaugé treated several hundred adolescents by advising them to change their masturbation habits to closing their hand over their penis and moving it back and forth. Retraction of the foreskin was generally achieved after four weeks and he stated that he never had to refer one for surgery.[10][22]
    Surgical methods range from the complete removal of the foreskin to more minor operations to relieve foreskin tightness:
    • Circumcision is sometimes performed for pathological phimosis, and is effective.
    • Dorsal slit (superincision) is a single incision along the upper length of the foreskin from the tip to the corona, exposing the glans without removing any tissue.
    • Ventral slit (subterincision) is an incision along the lower length of the foreskin from the tip of the frenulum to the base of the glans, removing the frenulum in the process. Often used when frenulum breve occurs alongside the phimosis.
    • Preputioplasty, in which a limited dorsal slit with transverse closure is made along the constricting band of skin[31][32] can be an effective alternative to circumcision.[20] It has the advantage of only limited pain and a short time of healing relative to circumcision, and avoids cosmetic effects.

    Surgery

    Physicians often saw the natural, normal unretractability of the foreskin in infancy as pathological and recommended circumcision. Sometimes circumcision was performed in infancy to prevent phimosis.[33] "Many boys are circumcised for (pathological or physiological) phimosis before the age of five years, despite (pathological) phimosis being rare in this group".[34]
    A 2010 study from Brazil found that treatment of young boys with a topical steroid cream was more cost-effective than circumcision within the Brazilian public health system.[35]
    While circumcision prevents phimosis, studies of the incidence of healthy infants circumcised for each prevented case of potential phimosis are inconsistent.[36][19][23][37][38][39]

    Prognosis

    The most acute complication is paraphimosis. In this condition, the glans is swollen and painful, and the foreskin is immobilized by the swelling in a partially retracted position. The proximal penis is flaccid.

    Epidemiology

    A number of medical reports of phimosis incidence have been published over the years. They vary widely because of the difficulties of distinguishing physiological phimosis (developmental nonretractility) from pathological phimosis, definitional differences, ascertainment problems, and the multiple additional influences on post-neonatal circumcision rates in cultures where most newborn males are circumcised. A commonly cited incidence statistic for pathological phimosis is 1% of uncircumcised males.[23][37],[19] When phimosis is simply equated with nonretractility of the foreskin after age 3 years, considerably higher incidence rates have been reported.[36][38] Others have described incidences in adolescents and adults as high as 50%, though it is likely that many cases of physiological phimosis or partial nonretractility were included.[39]

    History

    • According to some accounts, phimosis prevented Louis XVI of France from impregnating his wife for the first seven years of their marriage. She was 14 and he was 15 when they married in 1770. However, the presence and nature of his genital anomaly is not considered certain, and some scholars (such as Vincent Cronin and Simone Bertiere) assert that surgical repair would have been mentioned in the records of his medical treatments if it had indeed occurred.[citation needed]
    • U.S. president James Garfield was assassinated by Charles Guiteau in 1881. Guiteau's autopsy report indicated that he had phimosis. At the time, this led to the simplistic speculation that Guiteau's murderous behavior was due to phimosis-induced insanity.[40]